Monday, July 10, 2006

Unemployed Workers Movement Debates

Originally published in Znet, July 13, 2003
By Marie Trigona
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2003-07/13trigona.cfm

“We were the most forgotten, neoliberal politics created this, we don’t have production value in the face of hegemony. For this we are the untouchables, the most marginalised of all. In the face of this we go into the streets as road blockers, this is how we made them see us, with our faces covered,” reflects Carlos from the unemployed workers movement in Argentina.
June 26, 2002 two activists from Argentina’s unemployed workers’ movement were killed during a road blockade of Pueyrredón Bridge in police repression. The repression was part of a government plan to step-up a state terror campaign to control growing social protest.
At a year since the deaths of Darío Santillán-22 and Maximiliano Kosteki-25, a week of activities were planned to denounce the government’s plan and reflect and analyse the practice and future of the unemployed workers’ movement. Unquestionably, the deaths and repression have left an unforgettable mark on the movement—generating internal debates and criticisms. The right to identity, self-defence and organizing to confront state repression are some of the debates remerging.
-Miguel
Before workers expressed themselves in the factory, stopping the factory, taking the factory, and because the unions betrayed the workers, they took on this method of blocking routes.

Capitalist visions have wrecked Argentina. Industrial centres have been replaced with abandoned, crumbling factories and joblessness. In search for cheaper labor markets factories have moved to new regions or concentrated production. Argentina’s economic collapse has swelled the ranks of the poor and jobless to levels never seen in its history. Today, 58% of the population living below the poverty line and 44% are either unemployed or underemployed.
In the shambles of an economically ruined nation, a new practice of protest emerged, blockading roads. Since 1997, what is now known as the unemployed workers movement has taken root. Without access to the factory and utility of tools for liberation—strike, sabotage, and occupying the factory , unemployed workers sought out new practices for struggle. Today road blockades are used to prevent merchandise from arriving to the market.
-Raul
June 26 we went to demand food subsidies and that they increase our unemployment subsidies, because 150 pesos is nothing. The government wasn't going to allow the blocking of the bridges. We knew from the start that there was going to be repression but the people didn't care. The people are hungry and they went out to get what's theirs.

Sectors from the piquetero organizations planned to blockade almost all major access to Buenos Aires June 26. Leading up to the killings, the corporate media publicised accusations that unemployed protesters are extremist, subversive and violent. The hype accompanied government threats to repress protesters’ planned blockade of a busy bridge.
“The attempts to totally isolate the capital will be considered a war action,” said former National Security Secretary Juan José Alvarez, June 19, 2002. Behind this threat there was a plan of repression and chain of agreements between the government, security forces and judges. Clear complot for the government to mount a campaign of violence and institutionalisation to soften “hard-line” piqueteros.
-Alberto
We are violent because we go with covered faces to block a bridge, yeah, how violent we are. We have relentlessly brought letters to politicians and they don’t care, our demands don’t interest them. They demonstrated that they don’t give a damn about us, because the answer they gave us were real bullets, lead bullets. They kill us for asking what belongs to us; they kill us for asking for dignity. They killed two brave compañeros.
Repression commenced as a police line situated in between two columns began to retreat to the side, but Commissioner Fanchiotti ordered 9 agents to stay. “They were looking for a prvocation to initiate repression. The formation of police lines gave clear indications of a pre-emptive plan to use violence. Ordering officers to stay in the middle of columns with their backs to protestors was completely illogical," states Sergio Kowalewski, a photographer wo took the phtos inside Avellenada train station which provoked national outrage.
Inside Avellaneda train station, 10 blocks from the bridge Darío Santillán and Maximiliano Kosteki were shot. Photos and witness accounts show that Santillán was shot in the back after kneeling to help already wounded Kosteki. The photos showed Fanchiotti himself dragging and dumping Santillán outside the station.
33 people were wounded with lead bullet wounds. Each shot was followed by an attempt to cover up the use of live ammunition, officers picking up red cartidges that hold lead bullets. Hundreds were shot with rubber bullets and 160 were detained.
Fanchiotti and other officials initially denied responsibility for the killings. National Security Secretary Juan José Alvarez publically claimed the piqueteros had been planning an armed struggle. Many journalists insinuated the piqueteros were armed and that their intentions were violent. Media magnate Daniel Hadad said on his Radio 10 show that the piqueteros provoked the police. Many news daily's censored photos that would incriminate the police or officials ordering the repression.
Photos and eyewitness accounts provided evidence to charge Fanchiotti and his driver, Alejandro Acosta, with double homicide and insinuate national outrage.
-Carlos
Self defense is the defense of a people, because if the people organize they have tools to struggle. The people have always had their defenses. It's not something that we invented. I believe the media taught us to see that the subversive and bad guy are always the ones who use a stick, slingshot and molotov in the street. The moltov has been around forever. Organizations have always had ways to defend themselves against an oppressive system. One of the most important things that we worked towards in the movement was dignity. I believe in what some of the compañeros say: if dignity means life than we were like the dead looking for life, If dignity means peace that we were looking for peace, if dignity means struggle than we took our sticks and slingshots and then we block the road and fight. If dignity means death, which is what we just saw the 26th, then we are wiling to face it, we move forward and struggle for our dignity.
"There's another spirit of resistance," expresses a compañero. Since June 26, many sectors from the unemployed movement have stopped covering faces and carrying sticks. Media and government once again began another campaign to criminalize the piqueteros, in this campaign media distinguishes between hardliners and those piquetero organizations willing to negotiate.
In order to appear willing to negotiate, autonomous organizations have left behind symbols of identity and tools for resistance. One of the criticisms that has generated is that while organizations permanently negotiate to make immediate demands heard (food and subsidies), organizations are unable to build tools for liberation.
June 26 arrives as Nestor Kirchner completes his first month as President. The repressive apparatus responsible for the deaths and injuries continue to function unchecked, although Kirchner has a seemingly soft discourse on the need for police to patrol protests. In the weeks since Kirchner assumed presidency unemployed workers organizations and human rights groups have met with Kirchner, recognizing good intentions and hope he is different from Duhalde.
Many are paying close attention to what Kirchner will do with unemployment subsidies (planes de trabajar) of $150 pesos per month or a little more than $50 U.S. dollars. “The movement seems happy with the unemployment subsidies the government is giving, those plans that were won with piquetero blood and the backs of the working class. Before with the transitory government of Duhalde, the plans were given to tide over the piqueteros.

Now the movement thinks that Kirchner has good will in continuing the plans. There is no more talk of genuine work or boycotting corporations. Many know that if they push for that they will appear as radical and the government will repress,” says Calu, piquetero from the Southern Province of Buenos Aires.
His concerns reflect the contradiction with the new visions of the piqueteros and negotiations in national politics. Negotiations determined boundaries between what is politically correct and illegal. Government can now legitimize the repression during piquetero blockades with the rational that it is illegal to impede transit.
Since the explosion December 19 and 20, 2001, Argentina has been celebrated as an example of autonomous resistance, while this spotlight has brought reflection and inspiration; the celebration has limited space for necessary criticisms to move society closer to social revolution. Without criticisms we are limited to only challenging neoliberal politics and fortalizing progressive officials that uphold exploitation and repressive state apparatus.

-Alberto
We need to make sure that the compañeros didn’t die in vain, to leave the enemy with the victory. When we reach social change or social justice, that’s when the deaths of our compañeros won’t be in vain.

-Lorena
If we don't go out to struggle for what belongs to us this is never going to change. Those on top are always going to stay with what they want, I think that needs to change, I don't know how. But it would be good to kill all of them.
All interviews are part of Chronicles of Freedom: Organizing Resistance, a documentary by Grupo Alavío.

Saturday, April 29, 2006

Zanon, Argentina


March 18, 2004
Zanon, Argentina
By Marie Trigona
Originally published as a Znet Commentary
www.zmag.org
At the break of dawn on a frigid winter day the workers of Zanon, a ceramics factory under worker control, file into the plant for the day's first shift (6am to 1pm). They greet the men in charge of security at the plant's entrance and punch in to the time clock.

Since March, 2002 the factory has been producing without an owner, bosses or foremen. The factory sits among the red earth and rolling hills of the Southern Neuquén province in Argentina and is the largest factory in the region. After a long-standing conflict with the owners for back pay, sudden closure of the factory and firings in the fall of 2001, Zanon's workers occupied the factory and set an example of resistance against capitalism for workers all over the world that workers can produce even better under self-organization/management.

"It was a decision to stay here and struggle or go home, I could have gone home but I decided to stay here in the factory and struggle. I learned to defend my 15 years of work here in the factory and fight," forcefully expressed Rosa Rivera, one of the 15 women among the 300 employed by the factory.

"The owners never paid taxes, during the epoch of former President Raul Menem they were given millions of dollars in subsidies, the exploitation of the workers was extremely high and the company were stealing Mapuche land for raw resources for the ceramics factory."

When corporate welfare ran dry due to the Argentina's economic collapse in 2001, Zanon's owners decided to close its doors and fire the workers without paying months of back pay or indemnity. October, 2001, of the 331 original workers, 266 decided to continue to come to the factory to work to continue in their job posts. For four months workers camped outside the factory, pamphleteering and partially blocking a highway leading to the capital city Neuquén.
During this time, the events Argentina's popular rebellion December 19 and 20, 2001 and the brief post-rebellion upsurge of other factory occupations and organizing among the popular assemblies and unemployed workers organizations also influenced the decision to begin working under worker control.

"When we re-entered the factory we began selling the materials produce on a small-scale level, when those ran out, we asked ourselves what do we do-fight for an unemployment subsidy of 150 pesos [about 50 US dollars] or put the factory to work?," explains Fransisco Mollinas.
In March, 2002 the workers of Zanon reentered the factory and began to produce. "This is a battle against individualism, against everything that those above impose upon us. Here inside the factory we are fighting for a new human being."

As soon as the workers began to produce without an owner or boss, relationships inside the factory were re-invented, breaking with hierarchical organization, isolation and exploitation. Workers describe the company's practices of controlling the workers-one example is that workers had to wear a uniform of a certain color, to identify which sector a worker belonged to and it was prohibited to speak with a worker from a different sector.

On the wall in the factory's offices hangs a ceramic tile with an image of a young man, Daniel, with an inscription remembering him as a fellow comrade who died in the factory. Production inside the factory was set to maximize the company's profits, reducing salaries to the minimum possible level, cutting corners on worker safety measures and pressuring workers to produce at higher levels making it possible to have less workers on the production line.

These conditions previous to the workers' occupation led to an average of 25-30 accidents per month and one fatality per year. In the years of Zanon's production, 14 workers died inside the factory. Since Zanon's occupation by its workers not one accident inside the factory has occurred. "With the owner, you worry and are pressured. Without him you work better, you take on more responsibility with consciousness," one worker comments.

The factory is now organized practicing the ideal of horizontalism, direct democracy and autonomy. Everything is decided in an assembly, there is no hierarchical personnel or administration. Each sector such as the production line, sales, production planning, press, etc, has a commission which votes in a coordinator. The coordinator of the sector informs on issues, news and conflicts within his or her sector to the delegate's table. The coordinator then reports back to his or her commission news from other sectors.

Today, Zanon employs over 300 workers and continues to plan to hire more workers. Since the factory's occupation over 70 workers have been hired. The workers' assembly decided that it is necessary to take on workers from the unemployed workers organizations. Most new workers participate in the MTD (Unemployed Workers Movement). Each worker receives 800-pesos a month salary, which was based on the cost of basic "canasta familiar" or family needs.

The factory that spans for blocks has 18 production lines, while only three are currently functioning. Meanwhile, the factory is only producing 12-15% of its capacity, with lowered levels of exploitation (workers working less hours, higher salaries) they have been able to hire new workers.

One of the keys to Zanon's success has been the insertion of the workers' struggle into the community. At the factory's entrance, workers have constructed a mural made of broken ceramics. The mural tells of the history of the struggle inside Zanon. It begins with men and women around a large pot cooking above a fire.

During the months outside the factory, neighbors, students and workers from piquetero movement demonstrated solidarity-giving funds and groceries for the workers campaign. The prisoners from the jail behind the factory donated their food rations to the workers. Social organizations such as Mothers of Plaza de Mayo have acted in solidarity, some of the women are 70-years old, have declared that they to will defend the factory with their lives.

Zanon's self-defense and security scheme is the back bone of the factory. The government's response to Zanon has been violent, using different tactics to evict the factory. The government has tried to evict the factory five times with police operatives.

Each time thousands of community members came to defend the factory. When there is the threat of eviction, everyone leaves their job posts and assumes the role of security-unemployed workers organizations with self-defense lines outside the factory, while the workers go to the roof-top to take on self-defense measures like using the sling-shot.

Prison number 11 sits right behind the factory. One night, we accompanied the workers in charge of night security on their nightly rounds around the factory we near the prison. About 20 meters away we hear "clack-clack", a prisoner guard loading his rifle while we pass by.

The factory has developed particular measures to ensure that infiltrators do not enter the factory. Each worker must punch into the time clock-not to punish him or her for arriving late but to keep track of who is inside the factory. Before the plant's security was used to guard against workers stealing equipment. Today, workers in security make sure each worker coming to work brought his or her sling-shot to work.

On November 25, 2003 workers from Zanon and unemployed workers organizations in Nuequén protested a debit card for the unemployed (rather than receiving the 150-unemployement welfare to work subsidy in cash the government now wants the jobless to use the bank card, forcing them to only be able to take out a minimum amount in cash from the banks and having to purchase defined goods in 'commercial networks' which are to be transnational supermarkets).

The protests ended with violent state repression. There were over 22 injured - 10 from lead bullet wounds. Andrés from MTD and worker of occupied ceramics factory Zanon was injured with over 64 impacts from rubber bullets. He was held for over 8 hours by police without medical attention while he was tortured. He lost his left eye.

On December 2, 2003 seven hooded men entered the factory armed and stole 32,000-pesos. This was also after organizations in Nuequén were brutally repressed in November and workers and activists with MTD were continuously threatened in their homes. "We see this as a way to pressure those of us who are struggling for a more just society," published the workers in a press release after the infiltrators made off with the money.

The government is also using cooperatives to co-opt the factories under worker control. Other than Zanon, there is only one business, Tigre supermarket in Rosario that has refused cooperatization. "The government is co-opting the movement through different methods. The state offers cooperatives but you have to stop struggling," explains Raul Godoy, worker at Zanon.

The workers of Brukman, suit factory in Buenos Aires that was evicted on April 18, 2003, have reentered the factory recently but under cooperatization. They now have only two years to buy the machinery and building under the agreement that the government offered. Since the Brukman eviction, the political Left has been criticized for its damaging intervention in the conflict (convincing the workers that self-defense tactics were not necessary during the workers 16-month occupation of the factory and during the attempt to re-enter the factory after the eviction). The factory ! now has private security company, a shameful reminder of what the factory once symbolized.

Rosa Rivera, worker at Zanon for 15 years explains that Zanon is not only a struggle for the 300 workers inside the factory but a struggle for the community and social revolution. "If factories are shut down and abandoned, workers have the right to occupy it, put it to work and defend it with their lives."

In the shambles of Argentina's highly divided movements, Zanon continues as one of the most dynamic expressions of resistance against capitalism. The social process inside the factory has brought inspiration to break with the patrón (boss) for other workers occupying factories and for the working-class all over the world.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Bienvenidos a mujeres libres


Welcome to my new blog space. This is a simple blog meant for archiving my writings onto one site. I've never built a website or a blog so surely mujeres libres will improve over time.
Write to mtrigona@msn.com if you have any questions.
Un saludo solidario,
Marie Trigona

Blog Archive